<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secret to Training Engineers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/02/26/secret-to-training-engineers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/02/26/secret-to-training-engineers/</link>
	<description>By: Donnie Gladfelter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:05:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donnie Gladfelter</title>
		<link>http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/02/26/secret-to-training-engineers/comment-page-1/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Gladfelter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/02/26/secret-to-training-engineers/#comment-822</guid>
		<description>You bring up some good points, most of which being outside the scope of this particular post.  I do have some CAD Management/Training topics yet to be written which I think will bring some clarity to things.  Beyond that however, I think you may find one of my older posts “The Training Trinity” to be of interest to you: http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/12/01/au-2007-the-training-trinity/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bring up some good points, most of which being outside the scope of this particular post.  I do have some CAD Management/Training topics yet to be written which I think will bring some clarity to things.  Beyond that however, I think you may find one of my older posts “The Training Trinity” to be of interest to you: <a href="http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/12/01/au-2007-the-training-trinity/" rel="nofollow">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/12/01/au-2007-the-training-trinity/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Carris</title>
		<link>http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/02/26/secret-to-training-engineers/comment-page-1/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Carris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 03:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/02/26/secret-to-training-engineers/#comment-806</guid>
		<description>Very well, makes sense... Now what can you do about engineers who are multi-tasking on projects and dealing with project schedules and clients and everything else that goes on at most engineering firms? 

I guess what I&#039;m asking is how do you get engineers to focus on learning when they have so many other things going on? Don&#039;t you find they loose some of the information you taught them? How many actually go right out and use what you taught them right away? Maybe I&#039;m getting off the subject a little but this is the reality as most firms, don&#039;t you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well, makes sense&#8230; Now what can you do about engineers who are multi-tasking on projects and dealing with project schedules and clients and everything else that goes on at most engineering firms? </p>
<p>I guess what I&#8217;m asking is how do you get engineers to focus on learning when they have so many other things going on? Don&#8217;t you find they loose some of the information you taught them? How many actually go right out and use what you taught them right away? Maybe I&#8217;m getting off the subject a little but this is the reality as most firms, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donnie Gladfelter</title>
		<link>http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/02/26/secret-to-training-engineers/comment-page-1/#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Gladfelter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/02/26/secret-to-training-engineers/#comment-776</guid>
		<description>The secret is quite simply to tailor your presentation to the way engineers think.  Engineers commit fragments of information to their memory, and retain it based on its relevancy to other fragments already in their memory.  Anyone can read a book and do exercises.  So why invest in live training?  Simple, because a good trainer can establish links between information that otherwise appears irrelevant to your students. 

So much emphasis is put on trainers to know their material, and know the technical components of XYZ topic.  While that is important, a topic so often ignored is the importance in creating rapport with your users; both weak and strong.  Doing this will allow you as a trainer to establish an accurate cross section of your users, and consequently afford you the ability to create meaningful relationships between seemingly unrelated topics.

Being candid about the topic, such an approach is a bit of a double edge sword.  As your users harness a stronger understanding about XYZ topic, they often start getting curious about other more advanced features.  So the same person you were explaining LTSCALE to yesterday, is now asking for your help on annotative scaling today.  Or in other words, the user requiring a 5 minute response yesterday is now asking a question requiring a 30 minute response today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The secret is quite simply to tailor your presentation to the way engineers think.  Engineers commit fragments of information to their memory, and retain it based on its relevancy to other fragments already in their memory.  Anyone can read a book and do exercises.  So why invest in live training?  Simple, because a good trainer can establish links between information that otherwise appears irrelevant to your students. </p>
<p>So much emphasis is put on trainers to know their material, and know the technical components of XYZ topic.  While that is important, a topic so often ignored is the importance in creating rapport with your users; both weak and strong.  Doing this will allow you as a trainer to establish an accurate cross section of your users, and consequently afford you the ability to create meaningful relationships between seemingly unrelated topics.</p>
<p>Being candid about the topic, such an approach is a bit of a double edge sword.  As your users harness a stronger understanding about XYZ topic, they often start getting curious about other more advanced features.  So the same person you were explaining LTSCALE to yesterday, is now asking for your help on annotative scaling today.  Or in other words, the user requiring a 5 minute response yesterday is now asking a question requiring a 30 minute response today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Carris</title>
		<link>http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/02/26/secret-to-training-engineers/comment-page-1/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Carris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/02/26/secret-to-training-engineers/#comment-770</guid>
		<description>So what&#039;s the secret? I&#039;m curios to know how you teach engineers to retain the knowledge you provide. Better yet after class how many of them actually apply what you teach. How many resort back the way they did it before. How much time do you spend answering the same questions over and over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s the secret? I&#8217;m curios to know how you teach engineers to retain the knowledge you provide. Better yet after class how many of them actually apply what you teach. How many resort back the way they did it before. How much time do you spend answering the same questions over and over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MistressOfTheDorkness</title>
		<link>http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/02/26/secret-to-training-engineers/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>MistressOfTheDorkness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/02/26/secret-to-training-engineers/#comment-734</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed this artcile, Donnie, Thank you. It articulates fairly well the different thought processes of the technical mind. Cheers! ~bookmarking~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed this artcile, Donnie, Thank you. It articulates fairly well the different thought processes of the technical mind. Cheers! ~bookmarking~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
