<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Labeling Pipe Crossing Inverts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/01/27/labeling-pipe-crossing-inverts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/01/27/labeling-pipe-crossing-inverts/</link>
	<description>By: Donnie Gladfelter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:14:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donnie Gladfelter</title>
		<link>http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/01/27/labeling-pipe-crossing-inverts/comment-page-1/#comment-2429</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Gladfelter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/01/27/labeling-pipe-crossing-inverts/#comment-2429</guid>
		<description>Karl - I too fall into the camp of &quot;that should be easy enough&quot;, but haven&#039;t found an easy way yet.  The label mentioned in this post will report both station and elevation, but the reported values are of the profile, not the pipe.  It&#039;s not a big deal for the elevation, but the alignment number will of course be bogus for most pipe profiles inside a typical plan set.  The easiest way I can think to find this value is to use an inquiry tool in plan view.  It&#039;s still manual, and harder than it should be, but perhaps a little easier than manually calculating the station.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl &#8211; I too fall into the camp of &#8220;that should be easy enough&#8221;, but haven&#8217;t found an easy way yet.  The label mentioned in this post will report both station and elevation, but the reported values are of the profile, not the pipe.  It&#8217;s not a big deal for the elevation, but the alignment number will of course be bogus for most pipe profiles inside a typical plan set.  The easiest way I can think to find this value is to use an inquiry tool in plan view.  It&#8217;s still manual, and harder than it should be, but perhaps a little easier than manually calculating the station.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revit Architecture India &#187; REVERSE – Now a “real” AutoCAD Command</title>
		<link>http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/01/27/labeling-pipe-crossing-inverts/comment-page-1/#comment-2415</link>
		<dc:creator>Revit Architecture India &#187; REVERSE – Now a “real” AutoCAD Command</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/01/27/labeling-pipe-crossing-inverts/#comment-2415</guid>
		<description>[...] Labeling Pipe Crossing&#160;Inverts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Labeling Pipe Crossing&nbsp;Inverts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/01/27/labeling-pipe-crossing-inverts/comment-page-1/#comment-2398</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/01/27/labeling-pipe-crossing-inverts/#comment-2398</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the problem you&#039;ve presented well, in fact I have another issue that falls along the same lines.  I need to be able to not only label the crossing invert, but also to place the station along the crossed line and invert elevation where it crosses into a pipe or structure table.  The idea is to present a profile of the main line with the crossing symbols located along it.  I could label the crossings with an ID Name and then present a table that shows the stations along the main line where the crossings occur and their elevations and descriptions from the crossing pipes data.  It sounds like a pretty resonable request to me, but I can only extract the stations, etc. from the start or end of the crossing pipes - not at the crossing intersection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the problem you&#8217;ve presented well, in fact I have another issue that falls along the same lines.  I need to be able to not only label the crossing invert, but also to place the station along the crossed line and invert elevation where it crosses into a pipe or structure table.  The idea is to present a profile of the main line with the crossing symbols located along it.  I could label the crossings with an ID Name and then present a table that shows the stations along the main line where the crossings occur and their elevations and descriptions from the crossing pipes data.  It sounds like a pretty resonable request to me, but I can only extract the stations, etc. from the start or end of the crossing pipes &#8211; not at the crossing intersection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revit Architecture India &#187; Going to San Francisco for a Special Event at Autodesk</title>
		<link>http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/01/27/labeling-pipe-crossing-inverts/comment-page-1/#comment-2379</link>
		<dc:creator>Revit Architecture India &#187; Going to San Francisco for a Special Event at Autodesk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/01/27/labeling-pipe-crossing-inverts/#comment-2379</guid>
		<description>[...] Labeling Pipe Crossing Inverts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Labeling Pipe Crossing Inverts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
